High dynamic range lighting Teapot 234 fps Much better reflection handling. I actually was very surprised to see it that low on the links you provided. Final word So, which is ultimately the better buy? But how did they achieve that? This 2013 title just keeps giving, and looking at the results here it's clear that only the latest generation has truly tamed this game at 1440p. Where we start to see some meaningful separation is when cranking up the resolution to 1440p at Ultra settings. So, is it worth choosing the new model for 1080p gaming? Overclocking Even when overclocked, the 1660 Ti maintained basically the same operating temperature and fan speed, running just a single degree warmer.
Conveniently ignoring architecture, Nvidia has achieved less of an improvement in 31 months than it did in the previous 19. Is such a comparison even valid and useful, you might ask? So, if you want to know that how much performance, value and features this card offer over its major rivals then here I am going to tell you about it. What the heck is 1660, and then Ti? The first title to support the tech is Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus at best. Good to see it priced where it should be finally but that was a bit too little too late. Green team has dug themselves into a proverbial hole. You can hover over different parts of the chart to see different info and click to toggle between frame-rates and percentages.
Meanwhile in Content Adaptive Shading, the shading rate will be lowered in successive frames of the same objects, allowing for better performance. As we get some extra time for running more tests, we'll run our full suite of 30+ game benchmarks. . Similar margins are seen at 1440p. It also proves very capable at 1440p, pushing well over 70 fps throughout our test run. Also Great for Game Streamers One of the burgeoning career options for gamers is to be a game streamer. The rankings break down similar to the other charts, but the average fps for both cards is in the 30s, and about half the games fall below 30fps on the 1660 Ti.
Heck all of these new cards from Nvidia seem rushed and Ill conceived, I'm wondering what the hurry is. Really, though, both of these cards are most comfortable on High at this resolution, as you can see from the graph below. Not only that, but with over 60 fps rendered during our test, the 1660 Ti provided highly playable performance in Battlefield V at 1440p. That includes G-Sync monitors, and after a recent software update both cards can also work with FreeSync monitors. The focus was on new titles such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Apex Legends, Resident Evil 2 and Hitman 2, all of which heavily favored the 1660 Ti.
Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. If you read from days prior, the change here is very small at ~2-4 fps for the most part. Good call, my eyes are playing tricks. But now that both graphics cards can be snapped up for the same amount of money, which one is actually worth buying? If you're looking at strict fps per dollar or pound, Euro, etc. Our tests were performed using a high-end rig built around a Core i7-8700K processor, overclocked to 4. Parallax occlusion mapping Stones 272 fps Much better texture detail.
If Nvidia could kept the price a bit lower, it would be a must-buy. Using a 192-bit wide memory bus, that results in a peak throughput of 288. Very impressive stuff from this relatively small graphics card. Or keep splitting the cards somehow. I have a feeling that the Red team is going to gain a lot more market share in the coming months. Performance at 1080p is respectable as is gaming at 1440p. The meanwhile is far worse off, as it was effectively eliminated by the 2060 just three months after release.
With adaptive sync and 60 fps all the other frames rendered above this cannot be seen as our eyes cannot detect greater then 60 fps. Wrapping up the game benchmarks we have the new Far Cry title: New Dawn. Unified Cache Architecture Turing combines the L1 cache and shared cache, allowing for more higher performance regardless of your workload. Nvidia's own data suggest that the desktop GeForce install base is still heavily skewed towards older cards. Ti used to mean something.
It is a card that can really give a boost to the mainstream gaming segment, and has received much praise already. We have included 1080p and 1440p results here only, as there's no expectation for 4K gaming on either card - and both are best at 1080p. This boost combination allowed for an 8% performance increase when testing with Far Cry New Dawn. And for two, the Vega64 never trade blows with the 1070, it traded blows with the 1080 after initial launch. However, this does drop to a more consistent 30 per cent at 1440p, where both cards fall below 60fps on average. This graph gives us a good idea of where Turing is more efficient than Pascal and, of course, Turing is faster under all conditions.